Ranked Choice Including Pairwise Elimination: Difference between revisions
Ranked Choice Including Pairwise Elimination (view source)
Revision as of 18:12, 23 January 2021
, 3 years agoWording refinements
(Add page Ranked Choice Including Pairwise Elimination) |
m (Wording refinements) |
||
Line 17:
The last candidate to be eliminated is the runner-up candidate. If this counting method is used in the primary election of a major political party, and if the runoff or "general" election is counted in a way that is not vulnerable to vote splitting, then ideally the runner-up candidate would move to the runoff or general election along with the primary-election winner. Small political parties would not qualify to move their runner-up candidate to the runoff or general election.
Importantly, the runner-up candidate does not deserve to win any kind of elected seat. This means this method is not suitable for filling multiple seats, such as on a city council or in a multi-member district
To avoid spoiled ballots in elections where the voter uses a pen or marker to mark their paper ballot, more than one candidate can be marked at the same ranking level. When an elimination round involves two or more remaining highest-ranked candidates, the single vote is split equally among these candidates. This splitting of a single vote can be done using fractions or decimal numbers that do not exceed a total of one vote per ballot.
Line 30:
If two or more candidates have the same smallest top-choice count, this tie is resolved by eliminating the candidate with the largest pairwise opposition count, which is determined by counting on each ballot the number of not-yet-eliminated tied candidates who are ranked above that candidate, and adding those numbers across all the ballots.
If there is a tie for
If there is also a tie for the smallest pairwise support count, then another tie-breaking method is needed to identify which of the still-tied candidates to eliminate.
== Example ==
|