Ranked Choice Including Pairwise Elimination: Difference between revisions

Specify alternate method for handling same-ranked candidates if fractions and decimal numbers are not permitted.
m (Linked to relevant Wikipedia article)
(Specify alternate method for handling same-ranked candidates if fractions and decimal numbers are not permitted.)
Line 19:
Importantly, the runner-up candidate does not deserve to win any kind of elected seat. This means this method is not suitable for filling multiple seats, such as on a city council or in a multi-member district.
 
To avoid spoiled ballots in elections where the voter uses a pen or marker to mark their paper ballot, more than one candidate can be marked at the same ranking level. When an elimination round involves a ballot that has two or more remaining highest-ranked candidates, that ballot's single vote is split equally among these candidates. This splitting of a single vote can be done using fractions or decimal numbers that do not exceed a total of one vote per ballot. If a law does not permit the use of fractions or decimal numbers, the ballots that have the same shared ranking can be distributed uniformly among the same-ranked candidates, such as alternating which candidate gets each successive ballot on which two candidates are ranked at the same highest-ranked level. Regardless of which method is used, each elimination round re-calculates which ballots support which candidates.
 
Also to avoid spoiled ballots, if a voter marks more than one ranking level for the same candidate, only the highest-marked ranking level is used during counting.
106

edits