Ranked Robin: Difference between revisions
m
→Two different ways to present the results of the same election with Condorcet Winner Ava:
(Added section “Legal and economic viability”) |
|||
Line 139:
If there is a [[Condorcet winner criterion|Condorcet Winner]], then simply show each of the winner's pairwise matchups against other candidates. This can either be shown as percentage of total votes for each candidate in a given pairwise matchup, or as the percentage point difference in favor of the winner if there's a desire to show less information. If there is no Condorcet Winner but a single candidate wins without any tie-breaker, show how many matchups each candidate won in addition to each of the winner's pairwise matchups. These two scenarios will cover the vast majority of real-world elections.
==== Two different ways to present the results of the same election with Condorcet Winner Ava
<blockquote>
Line 168:
</blockquote>
==== Example of how to present the results of an election where the winner Ava is not a Condorcet Winner
<blockquote>
Line 218:
'''Level 8:''' Show the full preference matrix.
==== Example of showing Level 4 with 3 finalists in a Condorcet cycle
<blockquote>
Line 236:
</blockquote>Note that all of the Total Advantages sum to 0. This can be used to check the math performed.
==== Example of showing Level 5 with 3 finalists in a Condorcet cycle
<blockquote>
Line 279:
== Criteria ==
=== Passed
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrestricted_domain Unrestricted domain]
Line 299:
* [[Independence of Irrelevant Ballots]]
=== Failed
* [[Participation criterion|Participation]]
| |||