Reciprocal Score Voting: Difference between revisions

Since such fringe groups would likely be universally hated by every other faction, oneit waymay tobe partiallythe addresscase thisthat istheir tosupport additionallybecomes adjusteffectively theirrelevant reciprocityin ratioan factorselection. to includeIn the totalextreme ratingscase givenif toevery eachother faction, thatgives is, if athe fringe faction getszero ansupport, overallthen lowthe meanfringe score,faction's thensupport thatto lowevery meanother scorefaction iswill usedbe tozeroed lowerout. theThus, penaltytheir ofeffect noton reciprocatingthe withelection thateffectively factiondisappears.

If, however, there is significant support for the fringe faction, one way to partially address the issue is to additionally adjust the reciprocity ratio factors to include the total ratings given to each faction, that is, if a fringe faction gets an overall low mean score, then that low mean score is used to lower the penalty of not reciprocating with that faction. This way, sufficiently fringe factions largely give asymmetric support towards more mainstream factions, making reciprocation with them less necessary. Between similar largely acceptable factions, which would receive similar overall mean scores, the effect cancels out and RSV proceeds as normal.

Therefore, by taking into account mutual reciprocation as well as overall ratings RSV can be made to promote reciprocation only between factions that have similar levels of overall support. It is unclear how severe this issue can be, however, and further investigations are warranted.