Reciprocal Score Voting: Difference between revisions

Line 101:
: C = (1 - ''m'') 10
 
Such that B ceases to get any support from A. Thus, there is no incentive for B to defect, and they have an incentive to rate A highly. Even more curiously, suppose ''r'' = 3/4 such that A is a much larger subfaction than B. In most voting systems, such as [[Instant -Runoff Voting]], A would be safe not supporting B, but this is not the case under Reciprocal Score Voting. If A defects with ''b'' = 0, the exact same results as if B defected occur! Therefore, even if A has an advantage over B, it itis still in their best interest to support the minor faction as much as possible. This is akin to a "reverse spoiler effect", in which the larger mainstream party spoils the election by not supporting the smaller third party.
 
A "soft defection" (giving a low non-zero rating) would produce similar penalties accordingly, with a greater penalty for lower scores.
295

edits