Reciprocal Score Voting: Difference between revisions
→Passed/Failed criteria
Line 128:
* [[Later-no-harm criterion]]: fails. However, it is more robust with respect to the top-rated candidates (the voter's factions), as per above analysis. The harm to a voter's faction can only happen if there is significant overlap, making these failures less severe in terms of satisfaction. Candidates which are not top rated will suffer more severely from LNH violations.
* [[Monotonicity criterion]]: as RSV ties together the support given to multiple candidates, it is non-monotonic in a very exotic way, especially with respect to the favorite candidates: a favorite candidate can have a lower chance of winning by lowering the scores of another candidate.
* [[Condorcet criterion]]: fails by virtue of not being a ranked system.
| |||