Reciprocal Score Voting: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7:
Let <math>B^{v|\phi}_j</math> be the ballot rating of the <math>v</math>-th voter towards candidate <math>j</math>, where <math>\phi</math> is the set of factions assigned to that voter. This means <math>B^{v|\phi}_j > B^{v|\phi}_k</math> for all <math>j \in \phi, k \notin \phi</math>. Define <math>F_{i \to j}</math> be the mean rating given by faction <math>i</math> to faction <math>j</math>, and also that <math>F_{i \to \phi} = \frac{1}{|\phi|} \sum_{j \in \phi} F_{i \to j}</math>, that is, the mean of the rating given to all members of that set of factions, and similarly for <math>F_{\phi \to j}</math>.
 
ThenWith these established, Reciprocal Score Voting proceeds by re-weightsweighting and aggregating the ballot ratings according to the rule:
 
:<math>B^{v|\phi}_j \mapsto B^{v|\phi}_j \min\left( \frac{ F_{j \to \phi} }{ F_{\phi \to j} } , 1 \right)</math>,
 
that is, factions only receivegive support fromto factions they themselvesreceived support from, and in proportion to that support up to a maximum. Note the case of <math>F_{\phi \to j} = 0</math> only occurs when all <math>B^{v|\phi}_j = 0</math>, in which case no reweighing is necessary.
 
Only when factions agree on their mutual ratings and perfectly reciprocate is that their ''reciprocity ratio'' <math>\frac{ F_{j \to \phi} }{ F_{\phi \to j} } = 1</math>, in which case votes are left unchanged.
 
In the case of any asymmetry in support, the reciprocity ratio is <math>\frac{ F_{j \to \phi} }{ F_{\phi \to j} } < 0</math> for the faction which did not cooperate, and <math>\frac{ F_{j \to \phi} }{ F_{\phi \to j} } = 1</math> for the faction that cooperated. Therefore, not cooperating penalizes the side which did not cooperate more. In this way, factions are encouraged to cooperate as much as possible to maximize mutual support.
 
Therefore, not cooperating penalizes the side which did not cooperate more. In this way, factions are encouraged to cooperate as much as possible to maximize mutual support, forcing them to strike a balance between supporting their favorite as well as supporting alternatives as much as they can.
This system suffers from a very unusual "reverse spoiler effect", in which a larger faction may lose an election by not supporting smaller supportive factions. In this way, larger factions are encouraged to promote smaller factions as much as possible.
 
This system is non-monotonic and suffers from a very unusual "reverse spoiler effect", in which a larger faction may lose an election by not supporting smaller supportive factions. In this wayTherefore, larger factions are encouraged to promote smaller factions as much as possible in order to win.
 
The <math>\min(\cdot, 1)</math> condition above is required so that support is never amplified by asymmetry. This is also necessary so that a smaller faction cannot parasite on the support of a larger faction, which will never rate the smaller faction above its own. A smaller faction artificially rating a larger faction too highly will only receive exactly as much support as the larger faction is willing to give it.
295

edits