Revision as of 01:25, 4 December 2005 (view source) imported>MarkusSchulze No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:49, 4 December 2005 (view source) imported>MarkusSchulze No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 13: * [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2004-April/012671.html slight refinement] * [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2004-October/013971.html More concise definition]. In this last version, River is defined very similarly to ranked pairs. * [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2004-October/014102.html Example using 2004 baseball scores]. This shows how a 14-candidate election winner can be determined much more quickly using River than with RP or ~~Beatpath~~[[Schulze method\|Schulze]]. * [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2004-April/012678.html Early criticism of the River method]. This shows that the River method violates mono-add-top and mono-remove-bottom

River: Difference between revisions

River (view source)