Sequentially Spent Score: Difference between revisions
clean up (AWB), typos fixed: 2 seat → 2-seat
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (clean up (AWB), typos fixed: 2 seat → 2-seat) |
||
Line 1:
'''Sequentially Spent Score''' ('''SSS'''), also known as Sequentially Subtracted Score or Unitary Cardinal Voting, is a sequential [[Multi-Member System
▲'''Sequentially Spent Score''' ('''SSS'''), also known as Sequentially Subtracted Score or Unitary Cardinal Voting, is a sequential [[Multi-Member System |Multi-Winner]] [[Cardinal voting systems |Cardinal voting system]] built on [[Score voting]] ballots. Each round's winner is the candidate who has the highest sum of score. Between each round the ballots are adjusted such that a candidate cannot influence subsequent rounds more than the score they have remaining. This property of spending score is a particular implementation of [[Vote Unitarity]]. Sequentially Spent Score was invented by [[Keith Edmonds]] and [[Vote Unitarity]] was defined to describe this underlying theory.
==Procedure==
Line 87 ⟶ 86:
! rowspan=1 | [[w:Independence of clones criterion|Clone proof]]
! rowspan=1 | [[Participation criterion|Participation]]
! rowspan=1 | [[Proportional Representation
|- style="font-size:80%;"
Line 107 ⟶ 106:
Because this system is a Monroe type which is derived from the [[Hamilton method]] it fails participation. An illustrtive example is as follows.
To simplify,
Case 1:
| |||