Smith//IRV: Difference between revisions
Do minor cleanup, and add DMTBR disproof.
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Rename category) |
(Do minor cleanup, and add DMTBR disproof.) |
||
Line 7:
Example:
{{ballots|
48 C>B}}
B [[pairwise beat|pairwise beats]] A (51 to 49) and C (52 to 48), so B is the only candidate in the [[Smith set]] i.e. is the [[Condorcet winner]]. Therefore, A and C are eliminated, and B, being the only remaining candidate, wins.
Line 25 ⟶ 26:
It is also possible to do '''Condorcet//IRV''': "elect the Condorcet winner if there is one, otherwise elect the IRV winner."
Neither Smith//IRV nor Condorcet//IRV passes [[dominant mutual third burial resistance]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2022-March/003707.html|title=Condorcet-composite method DMTBR disproof|website=Election-methods mailing list archives|date=2022-03-25|last=Munsterhjelm|first=K.}}</ref>
==See also==
| |||