Smith//IRV: Difference between revisions
Added resistant set compliance, implying that the methods are strategy resistant even if they don't pass a particularly strong form of DMTBR.
mNo edit summary |
(Added resistant set compliance, implying that the methods are strategy resistant even if they don't pass a particularly strong form of DMTBR.) |
||
Line 27:
It is also possible to do '''Condorcet//IRV''': "elect the Condorcet winner if there is one, otherwise elect the IRV winner."
Neither Smith//IRV nor Condorcet//IRV passes [[dominant mutual third burial resistance]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2022-March/003707.html|title=Condorcet-composite method DMTBR disproof|website=Election-methods mailing list archives|date=2022-03-25|last=Munsterhjelm|first=K.}}</ref> though both pass when the DMT set consists of a single candidate. Both methods elect from the [[resistant set]], granting them greater resistance to burial strategy.
==See also==
| |||