SODA voting (Simple Optionally-Delegated Approval): Difference between revisions

Line 98:
 
So in the end, while any of the systems I mentioned would be, in my opinion, a clear net benefit versus plurality, with SODA you don't need my opinion or any qualifications like "'''net''' benefit". It is simply better, in every way.
 
=== "Spoilers are still technically possible under SODA" ===
This is true of any system without runoffs. In fact, systems which try too hard to make spoilers impossible, may open the possibility that a candidate who expects to lose the honest vote would trick the system into thinking the winner was a spoiler, thus beating them.
 
SODA, by providing perfect information, makes it likely that any true pairwise champion will be known as such, and will win.
 
=== "Allowing a candidate to delegate your vote could lead corrupt back-room deals, not the voters' will, to determine the outcome" ===
Anonymous user