Summability criterion: Difference between revisions
m
Maybe not say "Nanson's method" twice. Also add Benham to the non-summable category.
(Move Borda-elimination to k=2 category, provide sources) |
m (Maybe not say "Nanson's method" twice. Also add Benham to the non-summable category.) |
||
Line 8:
Informally speaking, the amount of data that has to be transmitted from the precincts should be less than the amount of data on the ballots themselves i.e. it must be more efficient to count the votes in precincts than to bring the votes to a centralized location.
Note: The word "mark/marking" is sometimes used instead of the word "bit (of information)". Na
=== Mathematical requirements ===
Line 33:
*[[Majority Judgment]]
*[[MCA|MCA-IR]], and some forms of [[MCA|MCA-AR]]
*[[STAR voting]]<ref>{{Cite news|title=Compare STAR and IRV - Equal Vote Coalition|url=https://www.equal.vote/star-vs-irv#simplicity|work=Equal Vote Coalition|access-date=2018-11-12}}</ref>
||
Line 39 ⟶ 38:
*[[Correlated Instant Borda Runoff]]
||
*[[
*[[Descending Acquiescing Coalitions]]
*[[Instant-runoff voting]]
|}
| |||