Talk:Australian electoral system: Difference between revisions
Add some criticisms on the current state of the page
m (Fix double link brackets) |
(Add some criticisms on the current state of the page) |
||
Line 2:
As you can tell I am very biased and partisan in this entry, but at least I think I put everything relevant to this website in fairly. Which is subjective of course. Now ideally what I would like to have on this page is the entire point of view backed up with appropriate evidence from www.aec.gov.au and others that 'PV or IRV is little better than plurality'. I am sure such a case exists and I have read them, but not one backed up with evidence from the Australian example in effect from 1920. [[Special:Contributions/144.135.254.196]] 12:42, 23 April 2005
I note that cases for and against particular voting systems are better prosecuted on their respective pages. Moreover, the analysis of why we have a duopoly is woefully misguided. The chief reason is electorates wasting the votes of approximately half of everyone. -- [[User:V.jackson|V.jackson]] ([[User talk:V.jackson|talk]]) 10:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
| |||