Talk:Australian electoral system: Difference between revisions

Fix link to the AEC
(Add comment on PR, STV, and IRV in Australia)
(Fix link to the AEC)
Line 20:
::: I can confirm [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]]'s point; STV is not the problem for proportional representation. STV is used to elect the Senate, which has a relatively strong crossbench of minor parties and independents. It is still not fully proportional though, as Senate seats are allocated by state and territory, not by population. There's also some wastage of voting power due to the transfer method used ([[wikipedia:Single_transferable_vote#Transfers_of_surplus_votes|transfer of surplus votes in STV]]), but that's a minor problem comparatively.
 
::: The major problem for proportional representation is the House of Representatives, which is elected by electorate, using IRV. The electoral divisions are mostly fair, being directed by the independent [[https://aec.gov.au/ AEC]], and with limits on the disproportionality of the population in each. (I believe it's a statutory limit of 10%.) However, it suffers the problem of most electorate systems, in that the votes of whoever's against the winning candidate in that particular electorate are 'wasted'. -- [[User:V.jackson|V.jackson]] ([[User talk:V.jackson|talk]]) 03:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
19

edits