Anonymous user
Talk:CDTT: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>MarkusSchulze No edit summary |
imported>KVenzke No edit summary |
||
Line 7:
I have deleted the following sentence: "Whichever of these methods is paired with the CDTT, the combined method necessarily fails the [[Plurality criterion]] and [[Condorcet criterion]]." In my opinion, this sentence ("... necessarily fails ...") could be interpreted as if [[CDTT]], [[Plurality criterion|plurality]], and [[Condorcet criterion|Condorcet]] were incompatible. However, the [[Schulze method]] satisfies the [[CDTT]] criterion, the [[Plurality criterion]], and the [[Condorcet criterion]]. [[User:MarkusSchulze|Markus Schulze]] 23 Jun 2005
However, the [[Schulze method]] is not one of "these methods." The article should say that when the CDTT is "paired" with a method that satisfies LNHarm, [[Plurality criterion|Plurality]] and [[Condorcet criterion|Condorcet]] are failed. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 07:47, 23 Jun 2005 (PDT)
| |||