Anonymous user
Talk:CDTT: Difference between revisions
→Missing justification
imported>MarkusSchulze |
imported>RobLa |
||
Line 21:
:Already in the pre-Woodall era, the CDTT criterion was discussed at the Election Methods mailing list under the name "beatpath GMC". The idea is: When the individual ballots can be completed in such a manner that candidate A is a Schwartz winner and candidate B is not a Schwartz winner and the individual ballots cannot be completed in such a manner that candidate B is a Schwartz winner and candidate A is not a Schwartz winner, then candidate B should not be elected. This guarantees that truncation doesn't needlessly lead to the election of a candidate outside the Schwartz set. [[User:MarkusSchulze|Markus Schulze]] 22:26, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
::Any chance someone can cook up a quick example to show this particular criterion at work? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] 04:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
|