Anonymous user
Talk:Condorcet method: Difference between revisions
→Self referential condorcet method
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 8:
: [[User:177.92.128.62]] Can you give an example? This is hard to follow. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
:: 1-10 Range voting and 3 candidates, A, B and C and 3 voters 1, 2 and 3:
::Voter 1: Give score of 1 to A, 7 to B and 8 to C
::Voter 2: Give score of 10 to A, 7 to B and 8 to C
::Voter 3: Give score of 4 to A, 10 to B and 5 to C
::C beats both A and B and is the normal condorcet winner, but loses the election to B ((10+7+7)/3)=8 VS ((8+8+5)/3)=7
::Under Self referential Condorcet Criterion each pairwise competition is made using the voting system being used (at this case range voting) so, B vs A is (10+7+7/3=8) VS (1+10+4/3=5) and B is the winner, B vs C is (10+7+7/3=8) VS (8+8+5/3=7) and here B is the winner to, and so he is the self referential condorcet winner, and the self referential condorcet winner, won the election, but the normal condorcet winner didnt.[[Special:Contributions/177.92.128.62|177.92.128.62]] 13:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
| |||