Talk:Condorcet winner criterion: Difference between revisions
→Smith set with two members
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (reply to User:RobLa) |
|||
Line 13:
:::: ''a candidate who beats or ties with every other candidate in a pairwise matchup. There can be more than one weak Condorcet winner.''
::: That article doesn't have a citation for that definition, though. What is the best citation for "weak Condorcet method"? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 23:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
:::: Just to give an example, suppose you have 2 voters bullet voting A, 2 bullet voting B, and 1 bullet voting C. A and B pairwise tie, but both pairwise beat all other candidates (C). [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 19:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||