Anonymous user
Talk:Definite Majority Choice: Difference between revisions
So ties have to be discussed
imported>Heitzig-j No edit summary |
imported>Araucaria (So ties have to be discussed) |
||
Line 7:
</pre>
Here no "majority agrees" that any candidate should be eliminated!
== So ties have to be discussed ==
I think I sent a suggestion in private email, but here it is again.
The initial page I put up was intended as a public elections proposal. So I wasn't thinking about ties.
In DMC, we eliminate candidates that lose pairwise matches to higher-approved candidates. Call the set of remaining candidates P.
If there is a tie, or if in a public election there is a near-tie (difference of, say, 0.01%), what about forming the superset P*, the union of all P's resulting from all possible reversed close races.
Then choose the winner by [[Random Ballot]].
| |||