Talk:Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem: Difference between revisions
Respond to User:Kristomun
No edit summary |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Respond to User:Kristomun) |
||
Line 2:
: Yes. G-S is about ranked methods. Gibbard's theorem shows that you can't escape the conclusions simply by making your method cardinal. See the introductory paragraph at [[w:Gibbard–Satterthwaite_theorem]]. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 09:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
:: "Whereas Satterthwaite's version only applies to ordinal voting systems, Gibbard's version applies to all deterministic voting systems, including non-ordinal ones. Combining Gibbard's version and a remark made by Satterthwaite" ... gives us G-S? Or Gibbard's theorem is a separate one from G-S? https://politics.stackexchange.com/a/14245 — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 19:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
| |||