Anonymous user
Talk:Imagine Democratic Fair Choice: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(how to interpret bullet votes) |
imported>Heitzig-j No edit summary |
||
Line 3:
I have a few questions, however:
* Could you allow more published rankings to be used, as long as they were registered sufficiently in advance of the election? This would allow, for example, labor unions, political parties, newspapers, etc., to make recommendations, and voters could choose the one they prefer.
** This could become an option after the method has been introduced successively, I think. [Heitzig-J]
* The approval aspect isn't clear to me -- is it equal ranking or not? I.e., when a voter approves of a bunch of alternatives, are they given equal rank or is the voter grouping them just below the favorite using ordering specified by the published ranking? What if the published ranking has equal rank of 5 for 2 candidates, but the voter approves one of them and not the other? That needs to be spelled out a bit more clearly.
** I hoped the example would make it clear: The rankings inside the approved subset and inside the non-approved subset are taken from the favourite candidate's published ranking, so approved candidates are not ranked equally! [Heitzig-J]
--[[User:Araucaria|Araucaria]] 11:22, 29 Mar 2005 (PST)
Line 18 ⟶ 20:
What do you think?
* I don't think there should be a difference! [Heitzig-J]
One other comment. Many of the IRV proposals allow ranking of only three candidates. This ballot is simpler but more expressive.
| |||