Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Reverted edit: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 13:
== Reverted edit ==
@Robla is there something you'd like to discuss? I thought my last edit to the main page made it more consistent. Not sure if there's something you disliked about it. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 17:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Closed Limelike Curves}} Per my email to you, we really shouldn't be removing [[instant-runoff voting]] from the home page ([https://electowiki.org/wiki/Main_Page?diff=prev&oldid=18210 as you did in oldid=18210]), since there are many people who prefer that system to many of the others on this wiki. I stopped liking IRV before it was called "IRV", but it's worth acknowledging the system has gotten traction in many parts of the world (even where I live). We want people searching for ''all'' forms of election method reform to find useful information here. Per [[Electowiki:EPOV]], we should "''err on the side of neutrality''" and have "''fairness to other points of view''". (p.s. you may want to learn how to use [[Template:Ping]] in your comments; both here and on Wikipedia) -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 06:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
{{Ping|RobLa}} I take it you didn't like the reference to two-round systems? I figured that should be fine, since even IRV is a straight-up Pareto improvement on two-round. —[[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 18:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Closed Limelike Curves}} It might not be. https://rangevoting.org/TTRvIRVstats.html I don't really consider rangevoting to be a reliable source; I'm just pointing out that even the cardinal guys are unsure. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 09:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
:That's surprising, but it seems possible they've since changed their minds? Papua New Guinea has a multi-party system, whereas California and Louisiana haven't developed much political diversity. TTR and IRV seem similar enough that I'd expect them to produce similar results. From a theoretical perspective (in terms of effective party count) I'd expect something like FPP < TTR < IRV < Condorcet < FBC-compliant. [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 03:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||