Talk:Method evaluation poll 2005: Difference between revisions
m
Psephomancy moved page Talk:Method evaluation poll to Talk:Method evaluation poll 2005: Since the other one has a date
No edit summary |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) m (Psephomancy moved page Talk:Method evaluation poll to Talk:Method evaluation poll 2005: Since the other one has a date) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 20:
::::No, I can't. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 23:59, 16 Jun 2005 (PDT)
== Condorcet//approval w Cutoff ==
I have joined here in search of a Condorcet method having certain features. I have looked over a few confusing pages like approval-sorted margins, and I have not yet found what I am looking for. Do any of the methods in this poll do the following:
Rank all (but one) candidates (no truncation, no ties) and include an approval cut-off among them; the winner is the Schwartz set member approved by the most voters.
[[User:Jrfisher|Jrfisher]] 12:39, 17 Aug 2005 (PDT)
I will add Schwartz//Approval with explicit cutoff for you. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 11:43, 18 Aug 2005 (PDT)
| |||