Anonymous user
Talk:Method evaluation poll 2005: Difference between revisions
→Rating methods
imported>James Green-Armytage |
imported>James Green-Armytage |
||
Line 14:
::I am not considering salability, unless in that you include considerations of whether voters will be able to sensibly use the method. I think approval cutoffs and 0-100 rating are both likely to disappoint in this respect. I consider 0-100 even worse unless it's shown that the optimal strategy is not necessarily approval strategy. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 15:49, 16 Jun 2005 (PDT)
:::Can you demonstrate that approval strategy ''is'' always the optimal strategy in [http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/cwp13.htm cardinal pairwise]? Because approval strategy is nearly always optimal in ordinary range voting, many people assume that it is also optimal in cardinal pairwise. But I haven't seen a demonstration of that yet. To make the demonstration even harder, assume that the maximizing in scale provision is used... [[User:James Green-Armytage|James Green-Armytage]] 18:25, 16 Jun 2005 (PDT)
| |||