Talk:Minet Ranked-Choice Voting: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Created page with "He talks about "Truncated MRCV" (where candidates are eliminated until one gets a majority of first preferences) vs "Pure MRCV" (where candidates are eliminated until there is...") |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4:
But the non-linear distribution of points makes this not equivalent? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 05:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Also he talks about the exponent being adjustable in http://royminet.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ElectionSimulationShedsLight.pdf:
"MRCV (pure) – Candidates are assigned an exponentially declining score based on the level at which the Voter has ranked them. An exponent of 0.7 was determined to work well."
Dowdall weighting is similar (though the system as a whole isn't runoff-based) in that the weights go down with each ranking, but is a [[w:Harmonic progression (mathematics)|harmonic progression]] rather than a [[w:geometric progression|geometric progression]]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 15:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
| |||