Talk:Pairwise counting: Difference between revisions
Article must remain neutral about how the counts are used.
(Created page with "I suggest using this table concept from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Burlington_mayoral_election#Analysis_of_the_2009_election Pairwise preference combinations:[21][2...") |
(Article must remain neutral about how the counts are used.) |
||
Line 79:
[[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 08:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
: When the vote-counting method is specified, this alternate format has some advantages for some voters. (Yet other voters will be overwhelmed with TMI (too much information.)) However, this article must remain neutral about how the pairwise counts are used. The above example is not neutral because it specifies win counts, and because the order of candidates is clearly not neutral. If you want to insert a grid with real numbers then the Tennessee example could be used, but the sequence would be the sequence used in the ballots table (not a "winning" sequence). [[User:VoteFair|VoteFair]] ([[User talk:VoteFair|talk]]) 18:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
| |||