Talk:Partitionable: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Created page with "Is this equivalent to the Consistency criterion?") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
Is this equivalent to the [[Consistency criterion]]? - [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy]]
: According to the first line, it's stricter (if X wins in a plurality of the constituencies, then X must win in the combined constituency; you get consistency if you replace "plurality of" with "every"). But according to the second line, it's the same thing as Consistency. I think this page can be deleted; at least, I haven't heard anyone use the term on EM. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 20:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
:: It appears in https://rangevoting.org/Criteria.html:
::: 8. Partitionable: "Partition the voters into two subsets, such the Northern and Southern ones. Suppose that the same candidate X is elected by the North and by the South. Then X must be elected countrywide."
:: so I think redirecting it would be best. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 21:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
| |||