Anonymous user
Talk:Score voting: Difference between revisions
→move to "range voting"
imported>RobLa m (Reverted edits by 190.7.62.202 (Talk); changed back to last version by James Green-Armytage) |
imported>Araucaria |
||
Line 15:
Good question; I don't know. Maybe a good topic to bring up on the list. I was under the impression that it had a fairly well-established usage, but I could be wrong. Annoyingly, most of the google hits I get are clones of the wikipedia article (with this one at the top), and none of them seem to cite a seminal paper. Even if "range voting" doesn't have a good usage history, it's still probably better than the redundant "cardinal ratings", but perhaps "ratings summation" would be more descriptive?
[[User:James Green-Armytage|James Green-Armytage]] 10:12, 21 May 2005 (PDT)
Comment on the Condorcet Criterion violation example. If 51 voters vote A100>B90 vs. 49 voters with B100>A0, then isn't it possible that B-preference voters have an incentive under Range Voting to bullet vote for B instead of rating A truthfully? In that case, Condorcet correctly avoids giving that incentive.
--[[User:Araucaria|Araucaria]] 17:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
| |||