Talk:Sequential Monroe voting: Difference between revisions
Questions about quota and reweighting
(Created page with "== offical name of this voting method == Can we change this to Sequential Monroe Voting (since that's it's official name?). On any electoral reform forum you can call SMV seq...") |
(Questions about quota and reweighting) |
||
Line 2:
Can we change this to Sequential Monroe Voting (since that's it's official name?). On any electoral reform forum you can call SMV sequential Monroe or STV single transferable and people will know what you mean but it would be weird for the electowiki page on single transferable vote to just be called single transferable.
== Quota and Reweighting methodology ==
Is it necessary to use Hare quota? With Droop quota, the method can satisfy the Droop proportionality criterion. Droop vs. Hare should be an option depending on what type of representation you are looking for.
Is it necessary to zero out ballots that rate a seat winner above the quota-threshold rating? What if you reweight all ballots rating the winner at and above the quota-threshold rating by the same factor, sufficient to remove one quota of ballots? Does that cause the method to lose IIA and monotonicity?
(--[[User:Araucaria|Araucaria]] ([[User talk:Araucaria|talk]]) 19:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC))
| |||