| Display title | Talk:Stable winner set |
| Default sort key | Stable winner set |
| Page length (in bytes) | 4,874 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 3480 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 16:08, 15 June 2022 |
| Latest editor | Closed Limelike Curves (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:46, 7 May 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 10 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 1 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The example I added illustrates how there can be examples where the committee is in the core but it does not "seem fair". User:Kristomun added the further specification that it is not proportional. Being in the core is the strictest form of proportionality and implies more standard ones like Justified representation. I think it would be a mistake to say that the committee is not proportional. None of the underserved groups are a quota in size. Can we remove this claim? --Dr. Edmonds (talk) 16:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC) |