Anonymous user
Talk:Tactical voting: Difference between revisions
→Beware the "What if?" Scenario
imported>Jrfisher |
imported>KVenzke |
||
Line 38:
Moral of the story: If you're not an ivory tower theoretician working on an academic proof, then when confronted with a "What if?" scenario, always pause a moment to consider what it would really mean in the real world. You may discover that it's not worth designing around. [[User:Jrfisher|Jrfisher]] 12:47, 20 Aug 2005 (PDT)
:I offered the above scenario to suggest strategic differences between [[Definite Majority Choice]] and [[Condorcet//Approval]]. Unfortunately, [[User:Jrfisher]] has interpreted my presentation of this scenario as an attack on one or the other method, and believes that I believe the above scenario is realistic. He has since requested that I stop confusing people, and I have agreed. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 21:08, 20 Aug 2005 (PDT)
| |||