Anonymous user
Talk:Vote For and Against: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>KVenzke No edit summary |
imported>KVenzke No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
Would "vote for and against as many as you like" be a worse idea? This would satisfy FBC and I guess if the version with the 50% rule is used, burying wouldn't be as big an issue as with average ratings (nothing to brag about though). --[[User:R.H.|R.H.]] 09:54, 5 Aug 2005 (PDT)
With the 50% rule, it <S>wouldn't</S>'''would''' satisfy FBC. In either version, you'd have the problem of what to do when all candidates are disqualified. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 10:39, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)
I really meant "vote for as many and against as many as you like" --[[User:R.H.|R.H.]] 16:23, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)
I know. When voters can do this, there is a possibility that all candidates will be disqualified. I wasn't right about it failing FBC, though. [[User:KVenzke|Kevin Venzke]] 08:34, 7 Aug 2005 (PDT)
| |||