Anonymous user
User:R.H.: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>R.H. |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
==Judge and jury system where the judge gets rated==
[[User:R.H./Judge_and_jury]]
==New(?) single winner method==
[[User:R.H./Condorcet,_IRV,_travel_through_time_and_dimensions]]
==Approval Random==
Line 38 ⟶ 43:
Given that proxy voting is quite a new idea, this proposal is a rather tame version. First, once traded votes can't get traded again. "Allow trading with your vote?" means two things: It is the option for every voter to allow one's vote given to another candidate. And it is the option for every voter to accept that one's candidate will make concessions to others. A candidate's uncompromising votes can't be traded at all and in case the candidate makes concessions to others his/her uncompromising votes expire. This gives both voters for strong and weak candidates a reason to show some will to compromise.
I think Plurality Proxy Choice would be a good name.
==Instant version of approval with a second round==
Every voter gives a ranked ballot with an approval cutoff. First, the two with most approval are determined. Between these two the winner is decided by looking at all ballots for who is more often ranked ahead of the other.
[http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016112.html D'oh.]
| |||