User:R.H.: Difference between revisions

User:R.H. (view source)

193 bytes added , 16 years ago

no edit summary

Anonymous user

Revision as of 01:59, 6 July 2005 (view source) imported>R.H. (instant version of approval with a second round added) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:48, 12 June 2007 (view source) 72.140.201.91 (talk) No edit summary
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: ==Judge and jury system where the judge gets rated== [[User:R.H./Judge_and_jury]] ==New(?) single winner method== [[User:R.H./Condorcet,_IRV,_travel_through_time_and_dimensions]] ==Approval Random== Line 44 ⟶ 49: Every voter gives a ranked ballot with an approval cutoff. First, the two with most approval are determined. Between these two the winner is decided by looking at all ballots for who is more often ranked ahead of the other. [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2005-June/016112.html D'oh.] ~~This should pass FBC and Condorcet Loser and below-cutoff-no-harm-or-what-it's-called.~~