User talk:Lucasvb: Difference between revisions
→Visual explanations of voting methods
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (I guess a topic heading would be nice) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 10:
The wiki is 14 years old and has never had a ton of activity, so the goals/policies were never really solidified. Your input is welcome, especially on how to handle the separation of biased advocacy from neutral informative content (which are both welcome). See [[Electowiki:The caucus]] for the discussion topics and [[Electowiki:Policy]]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
== Visual explanations of voting methods ==
At the bottom of your user page, you mention that you're planning to create visual explanations for Condorcet and cardinal methods. This image might provide some inspiration: https://m.imgur.com/a/ssXCQIE. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 21:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
: Interesting take! The approaches I have in mind are based on intersection of winning-side half-planes and issue-based marginals. [[User:lucasvb|lucasvb]] ([[User_talk:lucasvb|talk]]}
| |||