User talk:Psephomancy: Difference between revisions
→Criterion compliance logic
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 110:
: That's fine with me. You mean evidence that is not a citation, though? What form would that take? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 05:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
: Quite a lot could be done with such an idea. Consider for example that if a voting method passes the majority criterion and ordinal cloneproofness, it must also pass mutual majority, since a mutual majority's preferred set of candidates are essentially a clone set where if you eliminate all but any one of them, the remaining candidate is the majority's 1st choice, and must win. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 19:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||