2012 Occupy Wall Street polls: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2:
 
== Preliminary pilot study ==
They first polled about 320316 people at Occupy protest sites and events around Manhattan, in the spring of 2012, to test the software and people's reactions.<ref name=":1" />
 
NoIn adjustmentthis waspoll, madevoters toselected correcta forcandidate theunder unrepresentativenessPlurality ofvoting, theand Occupythen voters;were itrandomly wasassigned justtwo toof comparethe other voting behavior under different systems.<ref name=":02">https://electology.org/podcastssites/2012-08-20_tj_rawlsdefault/files/Full%20Report.pdf</ref>
 
"If this year's elections were held today, what party's candidates would you favor?" with candidates:<ref name=":2" />
* Democratic Party
* Green Party
* Independent candidates
* Republican Party
* Libertarian Party
* Socialist Party
* A write-in option
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the voters; who were primarily OWS participants;<ref name=":2" /> it was just to compare voting behavior under different systems.<ref name=":0">https://electology.org/podcasts/2012-08-20_tj_rawls</ref>
 
The votes were tallied by hand, and it was much easier to tally the Approval and Score votes than the Instant-Runoff votes (which required 13 elimination rounds to find a winner).<ref name=":0" />
 
The Democratic Party won the plurality election by a small margin, with a total of 35% of the votes. The Green Party won under the other 3 methods.<ref name=":2" />
 
== Exit poll ==
On Election Day, November 6, 2012, they polled over 300 voters using custom software on ipadsiPads in Manhattan's left-leaning 69th Assembly District.
 
In this poll, every voter participated in all 4 voting systems.<ref name=":2" />
 
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the district, though polling only took place in a single district, so that the poll's plurality results could be compared with the results of the actual election in that district (and they were well-correlated).<ref name=":1" />
Line 18 ⟶ 32:
{{Reflist}}
http://manhattanlp.org/occupy-wall-streets-tj-frawley-on-how-to-fix-the-us-electoral-system/
 
https://electology.org/podcasts/2012-08-20_tj_rawls
 
https://electology.org/podcasts/2013-05-27_tj_frawls
 
https://electology.org/sites/default/files/Full%20Report.pdf
 
http://web.archive.org/web/20130728110015/http://www.paercom.net/downloads/files/Press%20Release.pdf