2012 Occupy Wall Street polls: Difference between revisions
→References: ref google groups email, convert all to refs
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (→References: ref google groups email, convert all to refs) |
||
Line 1:
In 2012, the Politics and Electoral Reform Working Group of [[W:Occupy Wall Street|Occupy Wall Street]] conducted experimental surveys in New York City to investigate how voters behave under four different voting methods: [[First Past the Post electoral system|Plurality voting]], [[Approval voting]], [[Score voting]] (0-5), and [[Instant-runoff voting|Instant-Runoff Voting]] (with a maximum of 3 rankings).<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|title=Podcast 2013-05-27: Follow-up with Occupy Wall Street's TJ Frawls|url=https://electology.org/podcasts/2013-05-27_tj_frawls|work=The Center for Election Science|date=
== Preliminary pilot study ==
Line 13:
* A write-in option
No adjustment was made to correct for the unrepresentativeness of the voters; who were primarily OWS participants;<ref name=":2" /> it was just to compare voting behavior under different systems.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|title=Podcast 2012-08-20: Interview with Occupy Wall Street’s TJ Frawls on Electoral System Pilot Poll|url=https://electology.org/podcasts/2012-08-20_tj_rawls|work=The Center for Election Science|date=
The Democratic Party won the plurality election by a small margin, with a total of 35% of the votes. The Green Party won under the other 3 methods.
Line 110:
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Score voting elections]]
[[Category:Approval voting elections]]
|