3-2-1 voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
imported>Homunq
Line 15: Line 15:
In this method, each candidate can pre-rate other candidates "OK", "conditionally OK", or "bad". If they do not explicitly pre-rate, they are considered to rate all others "conditionally OK". Once all ratings have been submitted, all "conditionally OK" ratings are turned to "Bad" if the rating coming the other way is "Bad", and to "OK" otherwise. Candidate ratings are public information.
In this method, each candidate can pre-rate other candidates "OK", "conditionally OK", or "bad". If they do not explicitly pre-rate, they are considered to rate all others "conditionally OK". Once all ratings have been submitted, all "conditionally OK" ratings are turned to "Bad" if the rating coming the other way is "Bad", and to "OK" otherwise. Candidate ratings are public information.


When a voter leaves a candidate X blank/unrated, X receives the lowest rating that they got from any candidate that voter rated "Good". So if the voter had rated candidates A and B "good", and both A and B rated X as "OK", then X would get an "OK" from that voter; while if either A and/or B had rated X as "Bad", then X would get a "Bad" from that voter.
When a voter leaves a candidate X blank/unrated, that counts as rating X as "OK" if strictly more than half of the voter's favorite candidates rated X "OK". Otherwise it counts as rating X "OK".

For example, if I rated both Aurelio and Amy "good" and left Beth and Chung blank; and Aurelio rated Beth and Chung as "OK", while Amy rated Beth "OK" and Chung "Bad", then I'd count as rating Beth "OK" (2/2 of my favorites rated her "OK") and Chung "Bad" (1/2 "OK"s, which is not ''more'' than half).


=== Undelegated 3-2-1 ===
=== Undelegated 3-2-1 ===