3-2-1 voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 03:27, 31 May 2017 (view source) imported>Homunq (→‎Footnote ²: rules for the third semifinalist) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:31, 31 May 2017 (view source) imported>Homunq No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In 3-2-1 voting, voters may rate each candidate “Good”, “OK”, or “Bad” (or rate one "Good" and leave the rest blank¹). The tallying process has three steps:		In 3-2-1 voting, voters may rate each candidate “Good”, “OK”, or “Bad”. (Alternately, they may rate one candidate "Good" and leave the rest blank; in this case their chosen candidate's predeclared ratings of the others are used to fill in the blanks.¹) The tallying process has three steps:

	* Find 3 Semifinalists: the candidates with the most “good” ratings.²		* Find 3 Semifinalists: the candidates with the most “good” ratings.²