Bucklin voting: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Wikipedia}}
 
'''Bucklin''' is a [[voting system]] that can be used for single-member districts and also multi-member districts. It is also known as the Grand Junction system after Grand Junction, Colorado, where it was first proposed. It is closely related to the class of [[:Category:Graded Bucklin methods|graded Bucklin systems]], in which equal and/or skipped rankings are allowed, which includes such systems as [[Majority Choice Approval]] (MCA) or [[Majority Judgment]]. Modern theorists tend to prefer graded Bucklin systems over ungraded ones, as they usually comply better with criteria such as [[FBC]].
 
== How did it work? ==
Line 90:
== Related systems ==
 
There are a number of variations of Bucklin voting such as [[Iterated bucklin|Iterated Bucklin]], [[Expanding Approvals Rule]], [[Maximum Constrained Approval Bucklin]], [[Venzke Bucklin Variant]] and [[Majority Choice Approval|Majority Choice Approval/ER-Bucklin.]] [[Majority Judgment]] is a cardinal voting system which is similar.
 
== Notes ==
Line 143:
 
* [[ER-Bucklin]]
* [[Expanding Approvals Rule]]
* [[Maximum Constrained Approval Bucklin]]
* [[Venzke Bucklin Variant]]
* [[Majority Judgment]]
* [[Evaluative Proportional Representation]]
* [[Iterated bucklin|Iterated Bucklin]]
 
== References ==
<references />
[[Category:Single-winner voting methods]][[Category:Ranked voting methods]][[Category:Monotonic electoral systems]]
 
{{fromwikipedia}}
1,196

edits