Cardinal proportional representation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Sequential Monroe voting]], [[Sequentially Spent Score]], and [[Reweighted Range Voting]] are the most common such methods. They are each based on different philosophies of what PR should be and differ in the details of how best to optimize for their particular philosophies. |
[[Sequential Monroe voting]], [[Sequentially Spent Score]], and [[Reweighted Range Voting]] are the most common such methods. They are each based on different philosophies of what PR should be and differ in the details of how best to optimize for their particular philosophies. |
||
=== Often-discussed properties === |
|||
[[Universally liked candidate criterion]]: Candidates who are given maximal support by all voters shouldn't affect the proportionality of the remaining candidates in the winner set when elected. |
[[Universally liked candidate criterion]]: Candidates who are given maximal support by all voters shouldn't affect the proportionality of the remaining candidates in the winner set when elected. |
||
[[Scale invariance]]: Multiplying all score by a constant leaves the result unaffected. |
|||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||