Category talk:Approval voting elections: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Also a summary of the summaries would be good (how much increase of support for third parties, how much bullet voting, etc.) Psephomancy (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Others to be summarized:

* [https://electology.org/blog/our-voting-method-train-wreck-maine-gubernatorial-election-shows-us-why 2014 maine election exit poll]
* [https://electology.org/blog/2016-freedomfest-straw-poll 2016 FreedomFest Straw Poll]
* [https://electology.org/blog/ces-conducts-republican-liberty-caucus-straw-poll 2015 Republican Liberty Caucus Straw Poll] (also Score)
* [http://scorevoting.net/AVGermany.pdf 2008 state elections in Hesse (Germany)]
* [https://electology.org/sites/default/files/2007_france_presidential_election_experiment_report.pdf 2007 French presidential election]
* [https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/cvsstarer/93-30.htm 1992 US Presidential election]
* [http://approvalvoting.blogspot.com/ IEEE elections]
* [https://www.fairvote.org/new_lessons_from_problems_with_approval_voting_in_practice Independent Party of Oregon]
* [http://scorevoting.net/FrenchStudy.html 2002 French Approval Voting study]
* [http://scorevoting.net/DartmouthBack.html Dartmouth]
* [https://sites.google.com/a/electology.org/www/pirate-elections-germany German Pirate Party]

Also a summary of the summaries would be good (how much increase of support for third parties, how much bullet voting, etc.) [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 13:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:19, 6 November 2018

Also a summary of the summaries would be good (how much increase of support for third parties, how much bullet voting, etc.) Psephomancy (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)