Category talk:Condorcet-reducible PR methods: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Category talk:Condorcet-reducible PR methods (view source)

Revision as of 08:13, 23 April 2020

1,393 bytes added , 4 years ago

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

BetterVotingAdvocacy

1,895

edits

Revision as of 00:20, 20 February 2020 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 08:13, 23 April 2020 (view source) BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8: : Now clearly that's not what we think of as the Condorcet criterion, so CW' hasn't been used much elsewhere. I think we can take that precedent for the Schulze M+1 criterion as well, even though you're right that the criterion, strictly speaking, leaves other options open. [[User:Kristomun\|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun\|talk]]) 00:20, 20 February 2020 (UTC) : As for the second edit, that's correct. Even if you go with the implication of the single-winner Condorcet criterion, Schulze's multi-winner criterion may fail to imply PR. Bloc Ranked Pairs can be shown to pass it using similar logic as you gave, since Ranked Pairs satisfies LIIA. I was reading "Condorcet PR methods" as "PR methods that are also Condorcet", not "methods that are also Condorcet PR". (E.g. by analogy, if we had a category for "Candidate-monotone PR methods", those would be methods that are both PR and satisfy the candidate monotonicity criterion given in the Expanding Approvals paper.) [[User:Kristomun\|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun\|talk]]) 00:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC) :: I have made the "Condorcet PR" category more prominent than this one. I think the current situation is a good compromise between our views: Condorcet PR gets to be the main thing people click on, but the only real content in it will be "Condorcet-reducible PR methods", so people can click on that for further information. To be honest, I'd prefer to erase the Condorcet-reducible category and write its description in the Condorcet PR category description, because I don't think anyone will get confused so long as that clear distinction is made on the page itself. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy\|talk]]) 08:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)