Anonymous user
Chicken dilemma: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>MichaelOssipoff |
imported>MichaelOssipoff No edit summary |
||
Line 30:
----
In the chicken dilemma scenario described in the premise of the Chicken Dilemma Criterion (CD), defined above, if B won, then the B voters would have successfully taken advantage of the A voters' co-operativeness. The A voters wanted to vote both A and B over the
----
Line 37:
ICT, [[Symmetrical ICT]], [[MMPO]], MDDTR, [[IRV]], [[Benham's method]], [[Woodall's method]]
----
Because CD is so simple, such a simple situaton, could there be another
simple implmentation of it?
...maybe one that doesn't speak of numbers of voters in the factions?
CD is sufficient, as-is, but here is a non-numerical definition:
== CD2 ; ==
'''Supporting definition:'''
The A voters are the voters who vote A over everyone else. The B voters are
the voters who vote B over everone else. The C voters are the voters
who vote C over everyone else.
'''Premise:'''
1. There are 3 candidate: A, B, and C.
2. If the A voters and B voters all voted both A and B over C, then C
couldn't win.
3. The ballot set is such that if C withdrew from the election and the
count, A would win.
4. The A voters vote B over C.
5. The B voters don't vote A over anyone.
'''Requirement:'''
B doesn't win.
[end of CD2 definition]
| |||