4,215
edits
Combined approval voting: Difference between revisions
Fixing Template:Cite arXiv inclusions
(Simplifying the wikitext of the introduction, making it _slightly_ easier to read the citations.) |
(Fixing Template:Cite arXiv inclusions) |
||
Line 12:
* "''true weight voting''" ('''TWV1'''),<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://royminet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/FollowOnSimLeadsToFirmProposal.pdf|title=Follow-on Election Simulation Leads to Definitive Proposal|last=Minet|first=Roy A.|date=2020-02-19|website=|page=3|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|quote=TWV1 allows voters only three score values: -1, 0, and +1.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://royminet.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ElectionSimulationShedsLight.pdf|title=Election Simulation Sheds New Light On Voting Methods|last=Minet|first=Roy A.|date=2019-11-23|website=|page=9|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|quote=the Candidate having the highest positive (or least negative) total is the winner}}</ref>
* "''evaluative voting (EV)''"<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/353/|title=Voting and the Cardinal Aggregation of Judgments|last=Claude|first=Hillinger|date=2004-06-01|website=epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de|language=en|access-date=2018-06-27|quote=The alternative that maximizes the sum wins. ... I argue for a three valued scale for general elections. ... with the scale (-1 (against), 0 (neutral), +1 (for)). In a committee of experts a more differentiated rule, EV-5, with the scale (-2,- 1,0,+1,+2) may be appropriate. ... A great advantage of EV is that the voter has no strategic incentive to withdraw his vote from the candidates he likes best.}}</ref> (though the latter can also be used for variants with more than 3 values.)
* "''net approval voting''" <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17213149|title=What is net approval voting?|last=cestith|date=2018-06-08|website=Hacker News|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-02-29|quote=you vote up, down, or neutral on each candidate. The candidate with the most approvals minus specific disapprovals wins.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://demosthenesgame.blogspot.com/2007/05/perhaps-way-out.html|title=Demosthenes' Game: Perhaps a Way Out|last=|first=|date=|website=|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-02-29|quote=Just two lines in the ballot: who you're for, and who you're against. The difference between 'for' and 'against' votes gives the candidate's net approval vote. Highest net approval vote wins.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/notes/occupy-hunger-strike/an-easier-solution-a-net-approval-voting-system/229304087140661|title=An Easier Solution - A NET APPROVAL VOTING SYSTEM|last=Kronos|first=Donald Arthur|date=2011-12-08|website=Facebook|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-02-29|quote=able to indicate approval or disapproval of any number of candidates ... as additive votes to show approval and subtractive votes to show disapproval, where the candidate shown to have the highest net approval is the winner.}}</ref> (though this term has a different definition in the context of [[Approval voting|approval]]-based committee selection).<ref>{{cite
The introduction to this article was originally copied from English Wikipedia on November 26, 2020.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Combined_approval_voting&oldid=987606443</ref>
| |||