Condorcet winner criterion: Difference between revisions
m
Handle possible ambiguity wrt majority criterion (or majority criterion being too lax).
No edit summary |
m (Handle possible ambiguity wrt majority criterion (or majority criterion being too lax).) |
||
Line 79:
A method passes the M-seat Condorcet criterion if its M-seat election outcome always contains such a ''b'' when he exists, and passes the multi-winner Condorcet criterion if it passes the M-seat Condorcet criterion for all M.
When M=1, and the
Note that Bloc Ranked Pairs and Bloc Score voting (if scored methods are considered) would pass this criterion, though they are not proportional, and the latter is not a Condorcet method in the single-winner case. So it may make more sense to consider Schulze's criterion as one of several that a multi-winner method ought to pass to be considered a Condorcet multi-winner or Condorcet PR method, rather than the definitive one.
| |||