Revision as of 17:15, 1 April 2024 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) (Added real election occurrence section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:04, 1 April 2024 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) m (grammar) Newer edit →
Line 59: Most real elections have a Condorcet winner. Andrew Myers, who operates the [[online poll\|Condorcet Internet Voting Service]], found that 83% of the nonpolitical CIVS elections with at least 10 votes had a Condorcet winner, with the figure rising to 98.8% for elections with at least 300 votes.<ref name="CIVS">{{cite conference \|url=https://www.cs.cornell.edu/andru/papers/civs24/ \|title=The Frequency of Condorcet Winners in Real Non-Political Elections \|last=Myers \|first=A. C. \|author-link=https://www.cs.cornell.edu/andru/ \|date=March 2024 \|conference=61st Public Choice Society Conference}}</ref> A database of 189 ranked United States election from 2004 to 2022 ~~found~~contained only one Condorcet cycle: the [[2021 Minneapolis Ward 2 city council election]].<ref name="GSM2023">{{cite arXiv \| last=Graham-Squire \| first=Adam \| last2=McCune \| first2=David \| title=An Examination of Ranked Choice Voting in the United States, 2004-2022 \|eprint=2301.12075v2 \| date=2023-01-28 \| class=econ.GN}}</ref> While this indicates a very high rate of Condorcet winners, it's possible that some of the effect is due to general [[two-party domination]]. ==Commentary==

Condorcet winner criterion: Difference between revisions

Condorcet winner criterion (view source)