ER-Bucklin: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(Formatting, typos, wikitable)
Line 1: Line 1:
ER-Bucklin is an old name for [[Majority Choice Approval]] (MCA). Please see that article, which mostly supersedes the following.
''ER-Bucklin is an old name for [[Majority Choice Approval]] (MCA). Please see that article, which mostly supersedes the following.''


== Definition ==
== Definition ==
It is a rated version of [[Bucklin voting]] that allows voters to give equal rankings to some candidates. There are at least two main versions of ER-Bucklin; these are '''ER-Bucklin(whole)''' and '''ER-Bucklin(fractional)'''.
It is a rated version of [[Bucklin voting]] that allows voters to give equal rankings to some candidates. There are at least two main versions of ER-Bucklin; these are '''ER-Bucklin (whole)''' and '''ER-Bucklin (fractional)'''.


== ER-Bucklin (whole) ==

== ER-Bucklin(whole) ==


''If a ballot lists n candidates as tied in kth place, count that ballot as a whole point for all n candidates beginning in the kth round.''
''If a ballot lists n candidates as tied in kth place, count that ballot as a whole point for all n candidates beginning in the kth round.''


Note: A candidate is ranked in kth place on a given ballot if there are k-1 candidates who are ranked strictly higher. For exampe, a ballot marked A>B=C=D>E>F=G=H=I>J should be considered to rank A to in 1st place, B, C, and D in 2nd place, E in 5th place, F, G, H, and I in 6th place, and J in 10th place. Thus, the ballot would not count in favor of E until the 5th round, and it would not count in favor of J until the 10th round.
Note: A candidate is ranked in kth place on a given ballot if there are k-1 candidates who are ranked strictly higher. For example, a ballot marked A>B=C=D>E>F=G=H=I>J should be considered to rank A to in 1st place, B, C, and D in 2nd place, E in 5th place, F, G, H, and I in 6th place, and J in 10th place. Thus, the ballot would not count in favor of E until the 5th round, and it would not count in favor of J until the 10th round.


This rule is perhaps unique in that it satisfies both the "[[favorite betrayal]]" criterion and the [[Majority criterion for solid coalitions]].
This rule is perhaps unique in that it satisfies both the "[[favorite betrayal]]" criterion and the [[Majority criterion for solid coalitions]].


== ER-Bucklin(fractional) ==
== ER-Bucklin (fractional) ==


''If a ballot lists n candidates as tied in kth place, count that ballot as 1/n point for all n candidates in the kth round, adding another 1/n point in each subsequent round until the ballot has contributed 1 point to all n candidates.''
''If a ballot lists n candidates as tied in kth place, count that ballot as 1/n point for all n candidates in the kth round, adding another 1/n point in each subsequent round until the ballot has contributed 1 point to all n candidates.''



== Example ==
== Example ==
Line 26: Line 24:
:::''or'':
:::''or'':


{| border=1
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
!#
!#
!1st
!1st
Line 51: Line 49:
|
|
|}
|}



=== ER-Bucklin(whole) tally ===
=== ER-Bucklin(whole) tally ===


{| border=1
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
!candidate
!candidate
!round 1
!round 1
Line 76: Line 73:
|30
|30
|}
|}



There is a tie between B1 and B2.
There is a tie between B1 and B2.



=== ER-Bucklin(fractional) tally ===
=== ER-Bucklin(fractional) tally ===


{| border=1
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
!candidate
!candidate
!round 1
!round 1
Line 107: Line 102:
A wins.
A wins.


''work in progress''
''Work in progress''


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 20:36, 8 August 2019

ER-Bucklin is an old name for Majority Choice Approval (MCA). Please see that article, which mostly supersedes the following.

Definition

It is a rated version of Bucklin voting that allows voters to give equal rankings to some candidates. There are at least two main versions of ER-Bucklin; these are ER-Bucklin (whole) and ER-Bucklin (fractional).

ER-Bucklin (whole)

If a ballot lists n candidates as tied in kth place, count that ballot as a whole point for all n candidates beginning in the kth round.

Note: A candidate is ranked in kth place on a given ballot if there are k-1 candidates who are ranked strictly higher. For example, a ballot marked A>B=C=D>E>F=G=H=I>J should be considered to rank A to in 1st place, B, C, and D in 2nd place, E in 5th place, F, G, H, and I in 6th place, and J in 10th place. Thus, the ballot would not count in favor of E until the 5th round, and it would not count in favor of J until the 10th round.

This rule is perhaps unique in that it satisfies both the "favorite betrayal" criterion and the Majority criterion for solid coalitions.

ER-Bucklin (fractional)

If a ballot lists n candidates as tied in kth place, count that ballot as 1/n point for all n candidates in the kth round, adding another 1/n point in each subsequent round until the ballot has contributed 1 point to all n candidates.

Example

36 voters: A>B1=B2>C
34 voters: B1=B2>C>A
30 voters: C>A>B1=B2
or:
# 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
36 A B1&B2 C
34 B1&B2 C A
30 C A B1&B2

ER-Bucklin(whole) tally

candidate round 1 round 2
A 36 66
B1 34 70
B2 34 70
C 30 30

There is a tie between B1 and B2.

ER-Bucklin(fractional) tally

candidate round 1 round 2
A 36 66
B1 17 52
B2 17 52
C 30 30

A wins.

Work in progress

See also

Bucklin voting